Humoreske

Editorial Reviews
Amazon.com essential recording
The very first notes of this extraordinary performance show how thoughtfully Anne-Sophie Mutter has approached the work. Sibelius's marking for the solo violin is dolce ed espressivo, which for most violinists would mean "with vibrato." But Mutter plays senza vibrato and achieves a hauntingly expressive effect over the muted pianissimo oscillations of the orchestral violins. Happily, she sustains this high level of engagement with the score through the entire account, playing the taxing solo part with riveting intensity, making every note count, producing a gloriously rich and varied tone, and giving the listener a memorable musical experience in the process. The effect of all this on André Previn and the Staatskapelle Dresden, to paraphrase Mark Twain, appears to have been prompt and electric. They give a spectacular reading of the score, one notable for both its sonorous depth and its sense of atmosphere. --Ted Libbey

Tracks:

Conerto For Violin And Orchestra In D Minor, Op. 47: 1. Allegro moderato
Conerto For Violin And Orchestra In D Minor, Op. 47: 2. Adagio di molto
Conerto For Violin And Orchestra In D Minor, Op. 47: 3. Allegro, man non tanto
Conerto For Violin And Orchestra In D Minor, Op. 47: Serenade No. 1 In D Major, Op. 69a - Andante assai
Conerto For Violin And Orchestra In D Minor, Op. 47: Serenade No. 2 In G Minor, Op. 69b - Lento assai
Conerto For Violin And Orchestra In D Minor, Op. 47: Humoresque No. 1 In D Minor, Op. 87 No. 1 - Commodo

Amazon.com essential recording

The very first notes of this extraordinary performance show how thoughtfully Anne-Sophie Mutter has approached the work. Sibelius's marking for the solo violin is dolce ed espressivo, which for most violinists would mean "with vibrato." But Mutter plays senza vibrato and achieves a hauntingly expressive effect over the muted pianissimo oscillations of the orchestral violins. Happily, she sustains this high level of engagement with the score through the entire account, playing the taxing solo part with riveting intensity, making every note count, producing a gloriously rich and varied tone, and giving the listener a memorable musical experience in the process. The effect of all this on André Previn and the Staatskapelle Dresden, to paraphrase Mark Twain, appears to have been prompt and electric. They give a spectacular reading of the score, one notable for both its sonorous depth and its sense of atmosphere. --Ted Libbey

Customer Reviews:

Dismal!.......2007-06-21

I am sorry to disagree with those who seem to like this performance as much as they do. I think that they should listen to what Isaac Stern does with this music -- to me the way it should be played. Here the soloist playing is, well, fussy and contrived. Mutter often emphsizes the wrong things and phrases and plays some of the notes in odd ways that I doubt the composer intended. Her rhubato, for example, does not inform, but instead distracts. Mutter and the orchestra play the work so slowly that they strain and sometimes very nearly lose altogether the integrity of the music's melodic line. How can one play Sibelius like this? (I do not think I can blame the tempos chosen on the conductor. Mutter seems determined to play almost everything too slowly.) Mutter's playing betrays no understanding of this music at all. Add the fact that neither the conductor nor the orchestra seems to have any idea of what Sibelius might be about, producing as a result laughably dull, directionless accompaniment, and we are left with a dismal performance by all.

A divider, not a uniter.......2005-11-02

Violin mavens aren't middle-of-the-road, any more than opera buffs. Mutter typically divides opinion strongly about whether her highly technical, extremely detailed and personal playing is a sign of exceptional musicianship or the opposite: a self-absorbed fussiness that ignores the composer so that everything can focus on herself.

I fall into the latter group. To my ears this is an impossibly fussed-over Sibelius concerto, with hardly a natural phrase to be heard. I won't go into detail--what's the point? The consensus here seems to be that this is a gorgeous woman playing a gorgeous violin in a gorgeous virtuosic romp. Okay.

Striving for effect (or maybe just showboating?).......2005-08-28

There seem to be two Anne-Sophie Mutters. The first was the violinist from her debut till about 1994, who made some of the best recordings I've heard in modern times, even if some of them were perhaps a *little* over-hyped. The second is this far more technical, far more, well, egotistical soloist, who seems to say in every recording, "Woohoo, look what *I* can do." Or, to put it another way, she plays the violin but not the concerto. Watching her in a recent documentary comment on her first recording of the Beethoven concerto, she said it had nothing to do with how she would handle the piece today. Undoubtedly so, and what a pity. I have nothing against interpretations that get off the beaten path and take us to unfamiliar regions, but her journey today sounds superficial, with overly-mannered playing (slooowing down at the eeend of eeevery phraaaaaase) and a futzing with vibrato and color every ten bars, rather than saving her special effects for key dramatic moments. That latter would demonstrate to me that she knows the *concerto* as well as the *violin.* As it is, now that she has conquered the fiddle--and there is no doubt that she has; she almost seems bored with it at times--she should dedicate her life to studying the *scores.* Hubby Andy (although he wasn't her hubby back then) wades through the work with a decaffeinated Staatskapelle Dresden, following his partner rather than sparring with her. The second movement works best, where things really do get a bit over the top at the big climax, but even here it comes dangerously close to hysterics and melodrama. This concerto to me is about fire meeting ice. In their hands, it's about blubber meeting more blubber.

For some really intense accounts, try Heifetz/Beecham, Mullova/Ozawa (and I'm generally not an Ozawa fan, but the two of them struck magic here), and above all, the gold standard, Oistrakh/Rozhdestvensky, where the fire and ice are almost too much to bear, and the technique is just as assured, if not as showboaty. Listening to these recordings, you get the impression the artists studied the work first and then decided how they would approach it from the point of view of violin technique. I greatly admire Mutter's prowess on her instrument, but technique is not an end to itself, and I have not gotten the feeling she has really penetrated a work to the core since her 1992 recording of the Berg concerto. Perhaps this is the danger of being the world's number one violin star at the moment. If so, she needs to get over herself.

A splendid rendition.......2005-01-28

The post-Karajan Mutter continues to impress me with her growing musical maturity, and her in-depth exploration of the Sibelius is yet another testament to her artistry. As with all of her recordings, her fabulous tone is evident throughout, as is a technique that is more than equal to the challenges of the composer. I would dispute the one reviewer who argues that she slows down in the more technically challenging passages; certainly one cannot make that claim in the 3rd movement, which is certainly as brisk in its tempi as any recording available on the market today, and in any case, Mutter has always had a tendency to try and draw everything she can out of each note. A particularly notorious example of this would be her youthful recording of the Beethoven concerto with Karajan, where slow tempi cause the whole piece to become absolutely bogged down to a level beyond redemption. One certainly cannot find anything of that sort in this recording of the Sibelius, which remains a coherent performance throughout.

So why only 4 stars? Well, first and foremost, Previn & the Dresden Staatskapelle really seems to be phoning in their performance at times, and with a concerto like this, such a defect can cause quite a bit of damage. This could be due to mike placement as much as anything, but whether it is the sound engineer or the performers themselves, the result is an ensemble that sounds at times disengaged and at others overwhelmed by the soloist.

Also, as another reviewer has observed, a 47-minute CD at full price (where a third of the music consists of nice but relatively inconsequential compositions), simply put, is a ripoff. Why not fill it out a little? Put all six Humoreskes on the recording, or a tone poem if you like, or perhaps a lesser known piece like the Suite Mignonne. There are plenty of options, but none is explored here. Consumers expect a full CD for full price, so DG should deliver accordingly.

However, the consumer should be have nothing to complain about when it comes to Mutter's performance. She certainly appears to be fulfilling all of her potential as an artist.

She did it.......2001-10-03

When I first bought the CD I was skeptical, I haven't found many non-Finnish musicians who could make Finnish music sound like it should. You have to be able to imagine vasts forests and thousands of blue, clean lakes on a sunny day in the backgraound. But Mutter did it. She plays with feeling and yet she is very sharp. The only diappoinment was the conductor, I think he did a very sloppy job, the orcestra was dragging along too much, it sounded like they needed a good kick in the pants. But Mutter's performance made it all up. One of the best performances of Sibelius I've ever heard.

Music Review:

Music Review

music review

Music Review

Sonic Boulevard

Duette für Klarinette & Holzbläser (Duets for clarinet and other woodwinds)

Halaczinsky: Nacht über Endenich Op83; Reflexionen Op79

Chris Sparks

Geosonic Grooves, Vol. 1

Ghost

La Prima Vez [Import]

Rap Music rap_music_27

Instinct

Guitar Legend [Box set]

Jazz Cafe Presents [Import]

DG vs a Luz Falsa Que Hipnotiza O Bobo [Import]

Guilty by Association [Explicit Lyrics]

Verdi: La Traviata

No Borders